Cable Terminations – Kits & Methods (Heat VS Cold Shrink)

Cable terminations are critical components in electrical systems, ensuring safe and reliable connections between cables and equipment. Proper termination prevents electrical faults, moisture ingress, and mechanical damage, safeguarding system integrity. Two dominant methods for cable termination are heat shrink and cold shrink, each with unique advantages and applications. Termination kits tailored to these methods simplify installation while ensuring compliance with industry standards. This article explores both techniques, their respective kits, and key factors to consider when choosing between them.

 

Cable Termination Methods

Cable termination involves sealing the end of a cable to protect it from environmental stressors and maintain electrical performance. The process typically includes stripping insulation, grounding shields, and applying stress-relief components. Two primary methods dominate modern installations:

 

1. Heat Shrink Method

 

The heat shrink method uses polymer-based materials (e.g., polyolefin) that contract radially when heated, forming a tight seal around the cable.

Process:

Strip the cable to expose conductors and insulation layers.

Slide pre-expanded heat-shrink tubes or components (e.g., stress cones, insulators) over the cable.

Apply heat evenly using a torch, heat gun, or oven to activate shrinkage.

The material conforms to the cable’s contours, creating a moisture-resistant, insulated termination.

Advantages:

Durability: Heat-shrink materials offer excellent resistance to UV radiation, chemicals, and abrasion.

Customization: Components can be tailored for high-voltage or complex cable configurations.

Longevity: Proven performance in harsh environments over decades.

Limitations:

Requires heat sources, posing fire risks in confined spaces.

Skill-dependent installation; uneven heating may cause voids or weak spots.

 

2. Cold Shrink Method

 

Cold shrink technology relies on pre-expanded elastomeric components (e.g., EPDM or silicone) held in place by removable support cores. When the core is pulled out, the material contracts at ambient temperature to seal the cable.

Process:

Prepare the cable by stripping insulation and cleaning surfaces.

Position the cold-shrink termination kit components over the cable.

Remove the support core (e.g., spiral plastic strip), allowing the material to self-contract.

The elastic memory of the material ensures a snug, uniform fit without external heat.

Advantages:

Ease of Installation: No heat or specialized tools required, reducing labor time and safety risks.

Consistency: Uniform shrinkage eliminates hot spots or voids.

Versatility: Performs well in temperature-sensitive environments (e.g., flammable areas).

Limitations:

Higher material costs compared to heat shrink.

Limited reusability; components cannot be repositioned once installed.

 

Termination Kits: Essentials for Both Methods

 

Termination kits simplify installation by providing pre-assembled components tailored to specific cable sizes and voltage ratings.

Typical Kit Components:

Stress Control Elements: Reduces electrical stress at the termination point (e.g., stress cones, grading tapes).

Insulating Tubes: Seals and insulates the cable core (heat-shrink tubes or cold-shrink sleeves).

Sealing Mastics: Enhances moisture and contamination resistance.

Hardware: Connectors, clamps, and grounding braids.

Heat Shrink Kits often include heat-activated adhesives for enhanced bonding, while Cold Shrink Kits feature pre-expanded sleeves with removable support cores.

 

Heat Shrink vs Cold Shrink

 

Comparison Dimensions Cold Shrink Heat Shrink
Ease of Installation No heat source required, quick installation in 10 minutes, even force is required to remove the support Universal tools (hot air gun, heating control requires experience)
Environmental adaptability -40℃~85℃ wide temperature range, salt spray/ultraviolet resistance (preferred for outdoor use) 85℃~150℃ high temperature resistance, low temperature environment (<0℃) casing hardening and brittle
Sealing performance Elastic adaptive sealing (irregular surface friendly) Hot melt adhesive + shrinkage double sealing (high surface flatness requirement)
Mechanical properties Vibration resistance/impact resistance (absorb cable displacement) High hardness shell (stronger mechanical protection)
Cost-effectiveness Material process complexity (unit price is 30%-50% higher) Mature industry chain (obvious cost-effectiveness advantage)
Typical scenarios High altitude/flammable/humid/low temperature scenarios (such as wind power equipment, underground cables) Conventional power distribution projects, indoor/ Large-scale construction in dry environment

 

Conclusion

The cold shrink method and the heat shrink method each have their own advantages and disadvantages and are suitable for different scenarios: the cold shrink method does not require heating, is easy to operate, and has strong environmental adaptability, which is suitable for complex environments, high-end scenarios, and rapid installation requirements; the heat shrink method has low cost, good sealing and mechanical protection performance, and is widely used in conventional environments and large-scale projects. When choosing, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the cable type, voltage level, environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, flammability, etc.), installation conditions (power supply, space) and cost budget. Regardless of the method used, correct installation technology and high-quality termination kits are the key to ensuring reliability. With the development of cable technology, both methods will continue to improve and innovate to meet diverse engineering needs. ​

GET A QUOTE

GET IN TOUCH NOW
×
We value your privacy
We use cookies to provide you with a better online experience, analyse and measure website usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Accept All